Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft Riga J F Hartknoch, 1781 , 856 Pp 2nd B Ed 1787 A Edition Ak 4 5 252 B Edition Ak 3 2 552 Critique Of Pure Reason Translated By Norman Kemp Smith Macmillan 1929 Translated By Werner Pluhar Indianapolis Hackett 1996 Translated By Paul Guyer And Allen W Wood In Immanuel Kant, Critique Of Pure Reason, Edited By Paul Guyer And Allen W Wood Cambridge University Press, 1997 In The Current Easter Book Fair There Will Appear A Book Of Mine, Entitled Critique Of Pure Reason This Book Contains The Result Of All The Varied Investigations That Start From The Concepts We Debated Together Under The Heading Mundi Sensibilis And Mundi Intelligibilis Thus Begins Kant S Letter To Marcus Herz From 1 May 1781 Ak 10 266.Kant S Own Copy Of This Book Was Housed At The Staats Und Universit Tsbibliothek K Nigsberg, Before Being Lost In 1945 Fortunately Kant S Marginalia Had Already Been Printed At Ak 23 17 50, As Well As In Erdmann 1881 They Are Also Included In The Guyer Wood Translation.
Immanuel Kant was an 18th century philosopher from K nigsberg, Prussia now Kaliningrad, Russia He s regarded as one of the most influential thinkers of modern Europe of the late Enlightenment His most important work is The Critique of Pure Reason, an investigation of reason itself It encompasses an attack on traditional metaphysics epistemology, highlights his own contributi Immanuel Kant was an 18th century philosopher from K nigsberg, Prussia now Kaliningrad, Russia He s regarded as one of the most influential thinkers of modern Europe of the late Enlightenment His most important work is The Critique of Pure Reason, an investigation of reason itself It encompasses an attack on traditional metaphysics epistemology, highlights his own contribution to these areas Other main works of his maturity are The Critique of Practical Reason, which is about ethics, The Critique of Judgment, about esthetics teleology.Pursuing metaphysics involves asking questions about the ultimate nature of reality Kant suggested that metaphysics can be reformed thru epistemology He suggested that by understanding the sources limits of human knowledge we can ask fruitful metaphysical questions He asked if an object can be known to have certain properties prior to the experience of that object He concluded that all objects that the mind can think about must conform to its manner of thought Therefore if the mind can think only in terms of causality which he concluded that it does then we can know prior to experiencing them that all objects we experience must either be a cause or an effect However, it follows from this that it s possible that there are objects of such a nature that the mind cannot think of them, so the principle of causality, for instance, cannot be applied outside experience hence we cannot know, for example, whether the world always existed or if it had a cause So the grand questions of speculative metaphysics are off limits, but the sciences are firmly grounded in laws of the mind Kant believed himself to be creating a compromise between the empiricists the rationalists The empiricists believed that knowledge is acquired thru experience alone, but the rationalists maintained that such knowledge is open to Cartesian doubt and that reason alone provides us with knowledge Kant argues, however, that using reason without applying it to experience will only lead to illusions, while experience will be purely subjective without first being subsumed under pure reason Kant s thought was very influential in Germany during his lifetime, moving philosophy beyond the debate between the rationalists empiricists The philosophers Fichte, Schelling, Hegel and Schopenhauer saw themselves as correcting and expanding Kant s system, thus bringing about various forms of German Idealism Kant continues to be a major influence on philosophy to this day, influencing both Analytic and Continental philosophy
- 796 pages
- Critique of Pure Reason
- Immanuel Kant
- 03 September 2019 Immanuel Kant